Two headlines that shared news
space over the last couple of days were the audacious attack and cruel killing
of Congress leaders and party workers by Maoists in Chhattisgarh and the arrest
of Chennai Super Kings team Principal Gurunath Meiyappan on charges of betting
and fixing Indian Premier League matches.
The details of both the
incidences are more or less known to the public by now. While it can be assumed
that the Indian upper middle class and above, youth and GenY, would be well
versed with the cricketing debacle, would have debated over it and would have
opinions on it, the brutal maoist attack , just news on the ticker and
newspapers, would not have evoked responses of the former’s magnitude. However
that is not the mainstay of the article.
Maoism is an internal threat, the
largest one at that. When the Prime Minister said from the Red Fort that
Maoists are our ‘own’ people, many would have questioned the reason for our
‘own’ people becoming dissidents and rebels. Of the variety of causes, one
stark cause would be destitution and economic alienation. Not many rich kids
become Maoists, do they? Tribes, the landless, oppressed, and also the gullible,
anti-nationals, become so.
Abject poverty is a concept that
almost all the readers cannot have a deep understanding of. My colleagues do
not believe when it is told that people do live on less that Rs 3 a day; and on
that basis are classified as below or above poverty line. It is actually
unfathomable. But on the other side of the wall when it is brought to our
collective notice that Gurunath Meiyappan, an individual, allegedly lost Rs 1
crore (owning fancy yatches too) on betting, it is believable and thought to be part-of-the-game. It is so
because it is that world which is familiar to us.
It is the world of these
Meiyappans who have concentrated the wealth and with greed are exponentially
increasing it. Since money does not grow on trees, there is an imbalance that
is created by these people. It needs to be mentioned here that it is not a
diatribe against all riche people. In a capitalistic economy (with socialist
leanings in government’s policies) everyone has the right and freedom to earn
wealth. But when capitalism becomes crony capitalism, it becomes unhealthy and
a cancerous growth like that of Maoism today occurs.
The recent attacks are to be
condemned; the brutality with which it was conducted is scary; but it should
not lead to an ‘eye for an eye’ situation. Heavy handedness of administration
is required to crush a revolution but that it has not been achieved after
several years shows the complexity and multi dimensionality of the situation.
With the military might, the money-might issue needs addressing. In an
increasingly evident and felt rich-poor divide, in an increasingly oppressive
regime and its cronies, in an increasingly intolerant society, Meiyappans need
to be crushed in order to crush the excesses of the Maoists.
Nice take, but i have a problem justifying violence on the maoists end and the corruption on the meiappan end. there are means of getting govts to act without taking to guns. There are means to become rich (albeit difficult) without being corrupt. The only thing connecting these two is a decline in morals.
ReplyDeleteThanks for writing in madam... i appreciate it. Violence in any form is not justified, i dont endorse it. My point of view is that if governments would ensure equality, some of the ill gotten wealth would trickle to others. Maoism at one level is an offshoot of imbalance in society. Declining morality would be at the root of most evils.
ReplyDeleteThe problem is that the hammer never hits the nail to the right side, and the twisted nail inflicts, repetitively. Wise and educated cabinet, and a sensitive mindset is what we need. Order and mutual respect.
ReplyDeleteThanls for writing in Suruchi... this repeated infliction analogy fits perfectly. Sensitive mindset, you would agree would be a philosophy that would be desirable for every being. It warrants 'awareness'.
Delete